The decision by the Alabama Supreme Court in February 2024 to recognize embryos as “children” has significantly raised the profile of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) within the political discourse. Associate Justice Jay Mitchell stated, “Unborn children are ‘children’… without exception based on developmental stage, physical location, or any other ancillary characteristics.” This ruling has sparked significant controversy, particularly within the infertility community. Barbara Collura of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association voiced concerns, arguing that classifying a fertilized egg as a person raises profound ethical questions about the practice of IVF.
The complexity of these questions, however, goes far beyond political divides. The moral confusion surrounding IVF is not easily resolved through partisan viewpoints. Christians, especially within the Church, are in a unique position to offer clarity in guiding this moral discourse, especially when it comes to reproductive technologies.
The Ethics of IVF: Risks to Future Generations
A fundamental ethical issue surrounding IVF is the creation of potential harm to future human beings. While medical technologies inherently carry varying levels of risk, IVF introduces a unique dilemma. The key concern is that not all individuals involved in IVF—particularly the embryos—are able to give consent to the procedures or risks imposed upon them. This creates a scenario where the most vulnerable, unborn children, are exposed to significant risks at the will of their parents and medical practitioners.
Emma Waters, in her article A Christian’s Practical Guide to Reproductive Technology, highlights the concerning prevalence of adverse outcomes among children born through IVF. These children are at higher risk for conditions such as cancer, autism, cleft palates, and congenital heart defects. Bioethicist Oliver O’Donovan raises an important point, noting the ethical distinction between accepting the inherent risk of disability in a child—something that nature imposes—and consciously imposing such a risk in pursuit of personal goals. For Christians, who prioritize the protection of life from conception, the moral obligation lies in prioritizing the well-being of children, including those not yet conceived.
The Catholic Church’s Stance on IVF
The Catholic Church has consistently held a strong position against IVF, emphasizing the sanctity of procreation within the context of marriage. Official Catholic doctrine views IVF as morally unacceptable, arguing that it separates procreation from the marital act, which compromises the dignity of both the couple and the child. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, human life should come into the world through the exclusive and specific acts of a husband and wife, not through technological intervention.
The Vatican’s Donum Vitae document further critiques IVF, asserting that it treats children as products of technology rather than gifts from God. The Church also raises concerns about the potential destruction of embryos and the commodification of human life in the IVF process. This position was echoed by the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) in 2024, which also passed a resolution opposing IVF. Among the SBC’s concerns are:
- The creation of more embryos than can be safely implanted.
- The freezing, stockpiling, and eventual destruction of human embryos.
- The potential for unethical practices, such as sex selection.
- The routine destruction of embryos during IVF.
- The growing trend of genetic sorting and life suitability determination based on parental preferences.
The Ethical Dilemma of IVF: Life and Risk
A central ethical dilemma is whether it is justifiable to employ medical technologies that impose risks on the lives they aim to create. While IVF may offer hope to infertile couples, it raises significant moral questions about the welfare of the children it generates. Unlike medical treatments that address injury or illness, IVF involves creating life with inherent risks—risks that are not present in traditional procreation.
Medical technologies such as dialysis or cancer treatments serve to treat existing conditions without directly creating new life. IVF, however, introduces a new patient into the ethical equation: the child. This child cannot consent to the procedure, and IVF can subject the child to significant risks—both during the process of fertilization and within the womb. IVF, therefore, must consider the well-being of two patients, not just the mother.
Sexual Ethics and IVF: A Moral Compromise
Additionally, the ethical issues surrounding sperm collection for IVF are often overlooked. The practice of obtaining sperm in a clinical setting, sometimes with the use of pornographic materials, can be seen as a violation of the sanctity of the marital union. This introduces potential moral compromises, deviating from the natural order of human sexuality and intimacy. Such practices can also endanger the child’s well-being, particularly in cases where the child may face the risk of termination after being conceived.
Conclusion: Ethical Reflections on IVF and Reproductive Technology
The widespread acceptance of IVF brings forth profound ethical challenges that demand careful consideration. The risks—ranging from the destruction of embryos to the commodification of human life—raise difficult moral questions about whether IVF is a responsible and ethical choice for prospective parents. Both Catholic and Protestant denominations have voiced strong opposition to IVF, arguing for the sanctity of life and the importance of procreation within the marital union.
The ethical complexities of IVF call for a child-first approach, where the well-being of the child is prioritized over parental desires. As society continues to debate the merits and risks of IVF, it is crucial to reflect on the moral responsibilities we hold toward the most vulnerable among us—those who cannot consent to the circumstances of their own conception. Ultimately, the question remains: Is it ethically justifiable to use medical technologies that impose risks on the very lives they aim to create? This inquiry calls for deep reflection on the values that should guide reproductive practices and the sanctity of life at all stages.
Related topics:
IVF Baby Born at 26 Weeks Overcomes Preterm Complications, Successfully Discharged
Study Highlights Increased Exposure to Teratogenic Drugs in ART Pregnancies
