Vice President Kamala Harris made statements on reproductive rights during recent rallies in North Carolina and Pennsylvania, asserting that former President Donald Trump aims to implement strict measures regarding abortion, birth control, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and pregnancy monitoring. Harris claimed, “He would ban abortion nationwide. He would restrict access to birth control, put IVF treatments at risk, and force states to monitor women’s pregnancies.”
However, these assertions do not align with Trump’s stated positions. He has consistently opposed a federal abortion ban, advocating instead for states to determine their own policies. Trump has also proposed making IVF treatment free and has not supported government oversight of pregnancies. In his view, reproductive rights should be managed at the state level, a stance he reinforced during his September debate with Harris, where he remarked, “No, I’m not in favor of an abortion ban, but it doesn’t matter because this issue has been taken over by the states.”
Harris referenced Project 2025, a conservative initiative associated with the Heritage Foundation, to suggest that it aligns with Trump’s policies. However, Trump has distanced himself from this document, labeling its contributors as “far right” and contrasting them with his own views.
The topic of abortion is particularly salient in North Carolina, where recent legislative changes have shortened the legal window for most abortions from 20 weeks to 12 weeks following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Trump’s appointment of three Supreme Court justices played a significant role in that ruling, leading to stricter abortion laws in several states, including Texas, where abortion is now largely illegal.
While Harris emphasized the potential impact of her claims on undecided voters, especially given the high stakes surrounding reproductive rights, Trump has attempted to navigate the issue with a more moderate approach. He has voiced his disapproval of strict abortion bans and expressed the need for longer gestational periods in states like Florida, where a six-week ban was proposed. Additionally, he has called for maintaining access to abortion in cases of rape, incest, and health threats to mothers.
Harris’s mention of IVF follows a recent legal dispute in Alabama regarding the procedure’s legality, which ultimately led to a clarification that it would remain permitted. Trump’s proposal to cover IVF costs—an expensive treatment ranging from $15,000 to $20,000 per cycle—aims to encourage higher birth rates, stating that under his administration, insurance companies would be required to cover these expenses.
Trump has also reiterated his support for contraception, asserting, “I have never, and will never advocate imposing restrictions on birth control, or other contraceptives.” This claim contradicts Harris’s statements, highlighting the complexities and competing narratives surrounding reproductive rights as the election approaches.
Related topics:
